[rocprofiler-compute] Fix test case for MI 308 (#2934)
* Fix test case for MI 308 * Use consistent naming of GPUs in comment
This commit is contained in:
@@ -60,11 +60,15 @@ VALIDATE_METRICS = {
|
|||||||
"metric_id": "4.1.9",
|
"metric_id": "4.1.9",
|
||||||
"csv_file": "4.1_Roofline_Performance_Rates.csv",
|
"csv_file": "4.1_Roofline_Performance_Rates.csv",
|
||||||
"column": "Value",
|
"column": "Value",
|
||||||
# MI 300 series contains MI325X GPU which
|
# MI 300 series contains MI 325X GPU which
|
||||||
# uses improved HBM3E instead of HBM3 used in
|
# uses improved HBM3E instead of HBM3 used in
|
||||||
# MI300X GPU. Hence, multiple expected values
|
# MI 300X GPU. Hence, multiple expected values
|
||||||
# to cover both cases.
|
# to cover both cases.
|
||||||
"expected_values": [3910.62, 4287.31],
|
# MI 308 has lower bandwidth.
|
||||||
|
# MI 300X: 3910.62 GB/s
|
||||||
|
# MI 325X: 4287.31 GB/s
|
||||||
|
# MI 308: 2003.45 GB/s
|
||||||
|
"expected_values": [2003.45, 3910.62, 4287.31],
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
],
|
],
|
||||||
"MI350": [
|
"MI350": [
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user