032d39f15c
* Update branding in docs * Rename image used in documentation * Update names of code samples. In the code snippets, the "-" is not valid. ex., rocprof-sys_ --> rocprofsys_ * Update ASCII art * update Doxyfile strip_from_path * Add a "Formerly known as" message. * Fixed typo in product name ROCm Systems Profiler, not ROCm Profiler System * Add "Omnitrace" back to the metadata keywords * Update "install via package manager" section * Update paths to user API files * Rename configuration and environment settings * Update Doxyfiles Update publisher name & ID to "AMD". Update bundle ID to "rocprofiler-systems" * Update docs/what-is-rocprof-sys.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/conceptual/data-collection-modes.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/tutorials/video-tutorials.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/conceptual/rocprof-sys-feature-set.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/configuring-runtime-options.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/configuring-validating-environment.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/general-tips-using-rocprof-sys.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/reference/rocprof-sys-glossary.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/reference/development-guide.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/instrumenting-rewriting-binary-application.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/install/quick-start.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Note that videos were recorded using the "Omnitrace" name. * Rebase and update some file paths * Update paths to doc images * Update Omnitrace references in code snippets * Rename examples still using the "omni" prefix. * Update docs/how-to/performing-causal-profiling.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/profiling-python-scripts.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/sampling-call-stack.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/how-to/understanding-rocprof-sys-output.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> * Update docs/install/install.rst Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Peter Park <peter.park@amd.com> Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Novotny <jnovotny@amd.com>
148 lines
7.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
148 lines
7.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. meta::
|
|
:description: ROCm Systems Profiler data collection modes documentation
|
|
:keywords: rocprof-sys, rocprofiler-systems, Omnitrace, ROCm, profiler, data collection, tracking, visualization, tool, Instinct, accelerator, AMD
|
|
|
|
**********************
|
|
Data collection modes
|
|
**********************
|
|
|
|
ROCm Systems Profiler supports several modes of recording trace and profiling data for your application.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
For an explanation of the terms used in this topic, see
|
|
the :doc:`ROCm Systems Profiler glossary <../reference/rocprof-sys-glossary>`.
|
|
|
|
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
| Mode | Description |
|
|
+=============================+=========================================================+
|
|
| Binary Instrumentation | Locates functions (and loops, if desired) in the binary |
|
|
| | and inserts snippets at the entry and exit |
|
|
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
| Statistical Sampling | Periodically pauses application at specified intervals |
|
|
| | and records various metrics for the given call stack |
|
|
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
| Callback APIs | Parallelism frameworks such as ROCm, OpenMP, and Kokkos |
|
|
| | make callbacks into ROCm Systems Profiler to provide |
|
|
| | information about the work the API is performing |
|
|
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
| Dynamic Symbol Interception | Wrap function symbols defined in a position independent |
|
|
| | dynamic library/executable, like ``pthread_mutex_lock`` |
|
|
| | in ``libpthread.so`` or ``MPI_Init`` in the MPI library |
|
|
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
| User API | User-defined regions and controls for ROCm Systems |
|
|
| | Profiler |
|
|
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
The two most generic and important modes are binary instrumentation and statistical sampling.
|
|
It is important to understand their advantages and disadvantages.
|
|
Binary instrumentation and statistical sampling can be performed with the ``rocprof-sys-instrument``
|
|
executable. For statistical sampling, it's highly recommended to use the
|
|
``rocprof-sys-sample`` executable instead if binary instrumentation isn't required or needed.
|
|
Callback APIs and dynamic symbol interception can be utilized with either tool.
|
|
|
|
Binary instrumentation
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Binary instrumentation lets you record deterministic measurements for
|
|
every single invocation of a given function.
|
|
Binary instrumentation effectively adds instructions to the target application to
|
|
collect the required information. It therefore has the potential to cause performance
|
|
changes which might, in some cases, lead to inaccurate results. The effect depends on
|
|
the information being collected and which features are activated in ROCm Systems Profiler.
|
|
For example, collecting only the wall-clock timing data
|
|
has less of an effect than collecting the wall-clock timing, CPU-clock timing,
|
|
memory usage, cache-misses, and number of instructions that were run. Similarly,
|
|
collecting a flat profile has less overhead than a hierarchical profile
|
|
and collecting a trace OR a profile has less overhead than collecting a
|
|
trace AND a profile.
|
|
|
|
In ROCm Systems Profiler, the primary heuristic for controlling the overhead with binary
|
|
instrumentation is the minimum number of instructions for selecting functions
|
|
for instrumentation.
|
|
|
|
Statistical sampling
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Statistical call-stack sampling periodically interrupts the application at
|
|
regular intervals using operating system interrupts.
|
|
Sampling is typically less numerically accurate and specific, but the
|
|
target program runs at nearly full speed.
|
|
In contrast to the data derived from binary instrumentation, the resulting
|
|
data is not exact but is instead a statistical approximation.
|
|
However, sampling often provides a more accurate picture of the application
|
|
execution because it is less intrusive to the target application and has fewer
|
|
side effects on memory caches or instruction decoding pipelines. Furthermore,
|
|
because sampling does not affect the execution speed as much, is it
|
|
relatively immune to over-evaluating the cost of small, frequently called
|
|
functions or "tight" loops.
|
|
|
|
In ROCm Systems Profiler, the overhead for statistical sampling depends on the
|
|
sampling rate and whether the samples are taken with respect to the CPU time
|
|
and/or real time.
|
|
|
|
Binary instrumentation vs. statistical sampling example
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Consider the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
long fib(long n)
|
|
{
|
|
if(n < 2) return n;
|
|
return fib(n - 1) + fib(n - 2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void run(long n)
|
|
{
|
|
long result = fib(n);
|
|
printf("[%li] fibonacci(%li) = %li\n", i, n, result);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char** argv)
|
|
{
|
|
long nfib = 30;
|
|
long nitr = 10;
|
|
if(argc > 1) nfib = atol(argv[1]);
|
|
if(argc > 2) nitr = atol(argv[2]);
|
|
|
|
for(long i = 0; i < nitr; ++i)
|
|
run(nfib);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Binary instrumentation of the ``fib`` function will record **every single invocation**
|
|
of the function. For a very small function
|
|
such as ``fib``, this results in **significant** overhead since this simple function
|
|
takes about 20 instructions, whereas the entry and
|
|
exit snippets are ~1024 instructions. Therefore, you generally want to avoid
|
|
instrumenting functions where the instrumented function has significantly fewer
|
|
instructions than entry and exit instrumentation. (Note that many of the
|
|
instructions in entry and exit functions are either logging functions or
|
|
depend on the runtime settings and thus might never run). However,
|
|
due to the number of potential instructions in the entry and exit snippets,
|
|
the default behavior of ``rocprof-sys-instrument`` is to only instrument functions
|
|
which contain at least 1024 instructions.
|
|
|
|
However, recording every single invocation of the function can be extremely
|
|
useful for detecting anomalies, such as profiles that show minimum or maximum values much smaller or larger
|
|
than the average or a high standard deviation. In this case, the traces help you
|
|
identify exactly when and where those instances deviated from the norm.
|
|
Compare the level of detail in the following traces. In the top image,
|
|
every instance of the ``fib`` function is instrumented, while in the bottom image,
|
|
the ``fib`` call-stack is derived via sampling.
|
|
|
|
Binary instrumentation of the Fibonacci function
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
.. image:: ../data/fibonacci-instrumented.png
|
|
:alt: Visualization of the output of a binary instrumentation of the Fibonacci function
|
|
|
|
Statistical sampling of the Fibonacci function
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
.. image:: ../data/fibonacci-sampling.png
|
|
:alt: Visualization of the output of a statistical sample of the Fibonacci function
|